Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 14 of about 15
at the end of the day. when the economy is much less strong as is the case today, they don't do that. they have no need to do that. there is nothing more potent as a driver of education for those with less skill than a taught labor market and the need to hire. i would suggest to you that those who assert that slow growth and stimulus and what happens in the short run is the short run issue, what is most important is the concept of long run fundamentalss this the crucial point -- miss the crucial point. we are by allowing the economy remains stagnant committing grievous structural sins. we are squandering human capital as people withdraw from the labour force. we are missing opportunities for employment and training for workers in their most formative years. we are running an active set of measures that discourage investment in finding the most disadvantaged workers and we are providing limitations on the incentive to invests in research and development as a product of tomorrow. how then to think about our current situation and the strategy for moving forward? it is i think right to s
in the first place. wall street cannot be allowed to be reinstated. it drove our economy off the cliff and people tried to punish our records but they were not the ones that drove off the cliff. yet that is where the budget goes to recoup. it's time for us to have responsible regulation that makes sense. >> thank you very much >> moderator: final question i will be asking. you have three minutes to both answer the question and then make your closing remarks. mr. renacci, you talk a lot about a bipartisan group that you are a member of, 16 members, eight republicans, eight democrats, and devotee sutton you talk about reaching across the offer cash for clunkers. no single party can have all of the good ideas. i wonder what you heard from your colleagues on the other side of the all that makes sense, and what are you doing specifically to bring the governments instead of gridlock to the nation's capital? and i think we split ahead of time, and the first response, final response will go to congresswoman sutton. sutton: thanks very much for the question. i think building those relationships
for free? well, it is a two-sided part of the economy. you have people who want to engage in the search. they want to find things quickly and effortlessly through the internet. on the other side there are advertisers who are happy to purchase advertising from google and it will be presented to this consumers reveal themselves to be interested in looking for particular things. a restaurant or a kind of car or a book, what have you consumers do their part by lending their eyes. it is taken to a much higher value added level. you, the consumer, reveal through your search what you are really looking for. advertisers are able to zero in on a potential audience of what they have to sell. the interest that google has been offering its search engine. and how the search engine operates, i'd like to address a few of the higher-level questions. a few that have come up and whether it presents an antitrust problem with google. i am only going to focus on questions that originated in the u.s. and are analyzed. the first is google's ranking of specialized searches. i'll explain that in a moment. speci
think algerians would focus on surviving in the informal economy, but algeria will effectively return to the it is status quo. it'll be this big, glaring absence in north africa. the largest country in africa disengages from the international community, solutions to the instability that dr. zoubir mentioned, solutions to the instability in sir car or northern -- syria or northern mali. what would make this all the more glaring is if our worst fears about libya were to come to pass. as i mentioned before, the libyan government is very much committed to the road map they've laid out, they're very committed to the political process, but i'd like to bring you back to the middle of 2011. at the time, gadhafi's head of external security defected. and when he defected, he warned that libya would become like somalia. and at the time i think most frames of references were to mogadishu, to a black hawk down moment. and, unfortunately, we have had a black hawk down moment in benghazi. but i think he's, you know, a are nuanced guy. and what i think he was referring to was a much broader frame of
calculated. but the biggest challenge with the pgd is the economy i think. how to reconcile the desire to advance morocco's standing in international rankings, rocco's economic competitiveness with its calls for social justice. morocco's economic -- complicated by several factors. as i said the pgd only holds 107 seats out of 395 seats in the lower elected house of parliament. it only has 11 out of 31 ministers, cabinet posts. the upper house is also indirectly elected, which is indirectly elected by notables still dominated by a regime supported. when the government was formed, the pgd expected economic growth to be 7%. that was revised to 5% and then now to 3.5%. this will have repercussions on the pgd. so just to conclude and then can open up the question, thinking you still in charge. his personal legitimacy remains intact. he still very popular, usually. most moroccans desperately want change but insists on a peaceful transition that hurts the country down, taking the country down the risk of destabilization protests, which would necessary meet with violence state, repression. i h
can't, you should and don't even try. >> there's no jobs for human spirit the economy is bad. it's all my fault and i can't fix it. >> i'm betting on china. >> i'm in over my head. >> not enough money to pay the bank. and we have to move. >> you should vote for mr. romney. >> apparently one should manage to get some behind the scenes video of the president. we told you last week about for lucky donors who won a campaign contest to a dinner with president obama. at least they thought they were lucky until the bill came. >> watch would have been. not a fancy place but watch what happens when the check comes. the check is put down. the president very slyly slides it across. >> and look how much the check is. $14 trillion. 14 trillion. >> thanks everybody. that is it for this special report. >> you couldn't make it up, but why bother? there it is. i want to thank steve and just encase has the urge to start drinking of the, we have supplied them with a case of pbr. that's how he celebrates. the annual mrc dishonors award, as its winners chosen by distinguished cross-section of the vast righ
. romney also believes he's going to be up to stimulate the economy picks of the economy will grow, which means receives will go. is also said that is going to be able to tax loopholes. i'm not a tax expert, but it seems to me that there's an awful lot of those loopholes, and that will help. and again when we're only talking about essentially 1.4% of% of the entire problem, it se a doable doing to fix. you can't fix it in one year. you can fix in four years for sure. so at least i try to answer your question. now, i can't just sit back and listen to some of the stuff and be told in effect well, facts matter but you, dov, you just don't know any facts. first of all, one little fact, i really wonder whether mr. panetta who talked about the smallest number of ships since 1915, said that in a letter to your former boss, senator mccain, would really be happy to give this argument is ridiculous. wasn't a republican who made that case. it was mr. panetta. number one. number two, the navy is going to be bigger because i funded the ships that are being built. it takes a few years to get them out t
to the path, because it's the mechanism that'll make all the difference. >> the economy plays a significant role in recruitment and retention. will the economy coupled with talks to change military retirement pay and health care have a negative impact on retaining a professional all-volunteer force? >> i don't know. but, you know, as i travel around and visit with young soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines, and i also visit the coast guard from time to time, and i ask them why'd you come in, the answers are really varied. some of them come in because they want to defend their nation, and they know the nation's at war, and then some come in, as you noted, for economic reasons. what i will tell you is it doesn't matter why they come in, but because once you get 'em and you build into them this sense of purpose and sense of belonging, another attribute, by the way, that tends to be missing in american youth as they try to figure out who and what they are. by the way, i'm not trying to recruit you, but i will tell you that i'm happy to have your kids -- [laughter] but i will tell you that one
. such like that. it would be a huge boost and the economy. those still exist. i personally think they're still going to muddle through because the alternative is potentially so bad the policy-makers know that. i could be wrong, but hopefully. a rollercoaster. you will see good news, bad news, good news, bad news. is going to work, is that going to work. all the things that they cannot do it once. they have the will because of the politicians say there is no plan be. the ways really complicated. >> let's just keep "running for a second. you have the international financial meetings in japan. one of the things obviously, is the imf predictions for slowdown in global economic growth. alcoa announced this morning they're dropping off the global demand for aluminum which is something of an indicator. are you seeing the same thing in your business operations to make your business around the world, your international institution, are you seeing signs of slowdown? >> not quite like that. so europe is in mild recession. you see it. you could argue, but the government spends 50 percent of the m
the government, we will close down the american economy and, in turn, the global economy. if they do not solve the issue of this runaway spending, get some way to stop borrowing in excess, he tells the president of the united states if we default on this, on our obligations and our ious, we will trigger a depression worse than the 1930s. anybody here remember the 19 1930s depression? you probably don't. i don't. i was not born, but i've read about it. it was a calamity for the world. tim geithner said to the president what, if we default on this, if we do not solve this problem, we will have an economic catastrophe that will make the 2008 financial crisis a footnote in the history books. anyone remember the 2008 financial crisis? that's coming not from some columnist or journalist, that is coming from well-informed secretary of the treasury. you think about this, there is a value in running scared. if you think about after 9/11, the terrorist attacks, one thing the country did collectively is they set up tsa, the screening at airports. there are all kinds of work, very significant work done to
that women who want jobs can't get them because the unemployment rate is 8.2%. the fact that our economy is just going at 1.9%. the real war on women is that they can't get jobs and that their spouses and family members can't get jobs, and they are suffering with high gas prices,-prices, higher health insurance premiums, and they cannot find the ways to advance economically. >> how obama's gender policies undermine america is the name of the broadside by diana furchtgott-roth, and she rides americans live in two worlds. what is the everyday world in which they work, study, play, laugh, cry, love any. in the world women are more likely than men to succeed. women on average do better in school, but in work, better in life. women triumphant in everyday in america. the other america is a distortion constructed by radical feminists in washington politicians. these politicians make a career out of telling women that they are defeated. >> yes, that's because, by saying that women have to earn the same as men, it indeed is a lifestyle choice which is allows many women to choose a more sensible j
, there is no jobs for you man. >> economy bad. it's all my fault. and i can't fix it. i'm betting on china. >> i'm in over my head. >> don't have enough money to pay the bank, honey. and we have to move. [laughter] >> you should vote for mr. romney. [laughter] >> apparently one show managed to get some behind-the-scenes video of the president. we told you last week about four lucky donors who won a campaign contest to have dinner with president obama. at least they thought they were lucky until the bill came. >> what happens. it was not a real fancy place. now watch what happens when the check comes. you see the check is put down. the president very slyly slides it. look how much the check is. $14 trillion! 14 trillion. then he sneaks out. then he sneaks out. >> thanks for inviting us into your home tonight. that is it for this "special report". [laughter] >> you could make it up but why bother? there it is. want to thank steve and just in case he has the urge to start drinking heavily we supplied him with a case of pbr back there on ice. that is how he celebrates. the annual mrc dishonors award
the word autonomy. >> guest: combination of plutocracy in our economy. >> guest: autonomy is less excitable word than plutocracy. but his point was there a few platonic mates around the world and is characterized by a tremendous concentration of wealth at the top and the wealth that is greater than say the bottom 90%. and he says that's who's going to buy products. that is who's going to drive the economy and the middle-class is not as important. >> i think you seen the book for people who make less than $200,000, they don't count. just good they are relevant. and this is in the eyes of the hedge fund people. these are hedge fund people talking. and you can understand where they're coming from. the middle class in china endorse the middle-class. middle class in india, brazil, you name it. it's why they say the u.s. is kind of irrelevant nonsense. >> they are always looking for growth and that is the heart of global financial aristocracy. they want growth. they want rosenstock script on the companies at the multinational connections and operations and revenue streams. and that's why they see
've had a deregulated economy and we have produced through the deregulation, the spirit of the entrepreneur ship the individual going out and starting a business. the businessman or woman going out to risk their investments to start a business and hire people. we have produced 17 million jobs in this country since 1982 deregulation as a form of political process he is a good philosophy it's one that we agree with. they want a centralized government. but we believe in the market. we believe in the people coming investor is a role of government, and the role of government is to make sure that those safety and welfare of the people are taken care of. and we will continue to do that. >> moderator: senator bentsen? bentsen: i think we can see peace the debate, and the legislation that has been passed to try to protect the working men and women of america and you've seen the administration that came in and really didn't have its heart in that kind of enforcement. a good example of that is the environmental protection law that we were talking about a moment ago. this administra
are we doing on taxes on the constructive part of the economy, and we have to adjust them. >> okay. >> go back to 90, george bush entered into a deal that was supposed to be balanced and the trade off was reduced spending, higher taxes. the higher taxes for sure. this penny, that was to come later. we are still waiting. and i think, as thompson earlier, the negotiations, there's a lot of pieces to it. everything will end up being on the table, but there's no question that you've got to curb long-term medicare, entitlement costs as sort of a number one spending program that's in the federal government. and that's going to have to be looked at through health care reform and a whole bunch of other things that are complex. but you can't do one without doing what i would argue everything. >> okay. before we go, very pretty i would ask each of you with your optimistic or pessimistic, the things you think need to be done to restore business competitiveness can be done over the course of next four years, whoever wins the election on november 6. governor. >> i'm highly optimistic. i'm 100% certain
Search Results 0 to 14 of about 15

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)